Table of Contents

Digital Audio Editors

Recording and editing software for Linux. There seems to be two camps for audio editing:

  1. Digital audio (like music on CDs)
  2. MIDI audio (like music made on an elecronic keyboard synthesizer)

My focus is on the former, since I am interested in taking recorded material (such as speeches) and editing them.

Ardour

Ardour looks amazing, but coming from experience with Audacity it's usage was not immediately obvious to me how to do the simple editing tasks that I most often need. Ardour is called a Digital Audio Workstation (DAW), which apparently is something other than an audio editor according to some comments I've read (it seems all the same to me, just different levels of capability).

he GUI is easy to read and I intend to spend some time learning it when I have some time to spare.

Final verdict: Looks promising, but will take some serious time to learn. I'm not listing any pros and cons yet because I really have very little idea of how to use it yet.

Audacity

Pros:

Cons:

The Wikipedia Audacity page says:

In May 2021, after the project was acquired by Muse Group, there was a draft proposal to add opt-in telemetry to the code to record application usage. Some users responded negatively, with accusations of turning Audacity into spyware. The company reversed course, falling back to error/crash reporting and optional update checking instead. Another controversy in July 2021 resulted from a change to the privacy policy which said that although personal data was stored on servers in the European Economic Area, the program would “occasionally [be] required to share your personal data with our main office in Russia and our external counsel in the USA”. That July, the Audacity team apologized for the changes to the privacy policy and removed mention of the data storage provision which was added “out of an abundance of caution”.

Also see The Register for several articles about the controversies since the Muse aquisition.

Final verdict: Goodbye, old friend.

Audacium

A note in AUR posted on 12-Feb-2023 says:

Audacium has officially merged with Tenacity! Please use the latter instead of Audacium from now on.

Audacium is still available in AUR, but will not build on Endeavour. The error, for any interested, was this:

-- Conan: Adding audacity remote repository (https://artifactory.audacityteam.org/artifactory/api/conan/conan-local) verify ssl (True)
usage: conan remote [-h] [-v [V]] [-cc CORE_CONF] {add} ...
conan remote: error: unrecognized arguments: True
ERROR: Exiting with code: 2
CMake Error at cmake-proxies/cmake-modules/conan.cmake:853 (message):
  Conan remote failed='2'
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  cmake-proxies/cmake-modules/AudacityDependencies.cmake:4 (conan_add_remote)
  CMakeLists.txt:152 (include)

Tenacity

Tenacity is a fork of Audacity that came about because of the telemetry being added by Muse Group. The project has some of the original Audacity team members on it. It removes the telemetry and has some added features, but in Endeavour Linux it has not proven to be as stable as its parent. I have found it to work much more slowly and to crash fairly often, which reminds me of years gone by when Audacity would often crash.

As of this writing, in spite of the crashes, this is the audio editor I am using, largely due to familiarity with the interface. I tried installing the tenacity-git version, building from source, but ended up with a package that had no effects (no amplification, no fade, etc.). Building straight from the tenacity sources (rather than AUR), i.e.:

git clone --recurse-submodules https://codeberg.org/tenacityteam/tenacity
cd tenacity
cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build
cmake --build build
sudo cmake --install build
… gave only a slight improvement, offering all the Nyquist plug-ins under the Effects menu, but all the standard effects such as amplification, compression, etc. were still missing.

LMMS

The description of this product seems interesting, but on my 32-inch 2560×1440 monitor the user interface was so tiny that I had trouble reading the controls. I can't imagine using it on a smaller monitor. I'm not going to change screen resolution every time I want to run a certain piece of software, so this one is on-hold for now.

Final verdit: Nope. Too hard to read.

Ocenaudio

Ocenaudio is distributed in binary format on Arch AUR, rather than source, which is unusual and makes me wonder. The web site says, The development of ocenaudio began when a brazilian research group at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (LINSE) needed an easy-to-use audio editor loaded with features such as multiple file formats support, spectral analysis and audio signal generation. ocenaudio development focuses primarily on usability, providing the user with a cohesive and intuitive audio editing and analysis tool.

There is no licence indicated on the web site nor in the software itself, which is strange to say the least. AUR shows the licence type as custom. The web site seeks donations, so it does appear to be at least free, if not open source.

Pros:

Cons:

Final verdict: For routine editing of speech and stereo audio recordings, this looks like the one to replace Audacity for 95% of what I do.

Reaper

This is not a free product. It costs $60 for an individual licence or $225 for a commercial one (as of August 2024, see here). It pops up a nag screen to remind you of this on launch.

Pros:

Cons:

Final verdit: Not for me.

Rosegarden

This editor seems to be entirely for MIDI samples, not for editing digital audio files. Its description is: MIDI/audio sequencer and notation editor.

Final verdit: Not for me.

snd

An old editor that still works today, but the interface is very out-dated and the preferences are hard to understand. I managed to open a sound file, made the tool-bar visible, and started laying, but there was no cursor, which makes editing an exercise in futility. The operation was so quick that I spent 20 minutes trying to use it, to see if I could live with its shortcomings, but ultimately I had to give it up, the single biggest reason being the lack of a playback cursor.

Pros:

Cons: